Twitter’s Board of Directors is blocking the company’s shareholders from voting on Elon Musk’s buyout offer.
“The Twitter board is *refusing* to allow the shareholders of the company vote Yes or No on Elon’s offer,” Jack Posobiec commented.
“Twitter must allow the shareholders to vote on Elon’s offer! Democracy!” Jack Posobiec noted. “#LetThemVote trend it,” he added.
“Twitter’s board is now in breach of their fiduciary duty and as one of their largest shareholders,@elonmuskcan and should sue them,” he added. “And every other shareholder. Titanic liability.”
“Elon: I offer you 38% premium. Shareholders: Let’s vote. Twitter Board or Directors: No vote. Shareholders: Huh? Twitter Board: We will sell ourselves stock at a deep discount if Elon keeps buying stock. This is what democracy looks like,” Cernovich snarked.
“Twitter, Let them vote!” he added.
“Instead of accepting Elon’s premium to the share price, Twitter’s board is planning to dilute the company by giving insiders a sweetheart deal,” David Sacks noted. “This is a blatant violation of fiduciary duty and should be illegal.”
“This poison pill (defensive measure to prevent a takeover) isn’t just any poison pill,” Kip Herriage noted. “It’s the regime of the elite ruling class protecting one of their primary tools for indoctrination propaganda.”
“Board members should be sued ‘personally’ for BLATANT failure of fiduciary duty,” he added.
“Twitter’s insiders essentially just decided to screw over their shareholders, crash their stock, and open the company up to massive lawsuits just to prevent Elon Musk from running Twitter in a way that won’t rig elections or censor their political opponents,” Greg Price remarked.
“Twitter’s Board of Directors & this #poisonpill is in breach of fiduciary responsibility to shareholders,” Adam Rizzieri remarked. “2021: the company posted a $221 Million LOSS. 2022: @elonmusk’s involvement offered them a chance to go from being valued at $13.3 Billion to cashing out at $43 Bn.”
Elon Musk earlier commented on the “utterly indefensible” position of not putting his offer up to a shareholder vote.
“Absolutely,” Musk commented to a question from Nick Short. “It would be utterly indefensible not to put this offer to a shareholder vote. They own the company, not the board of directors.”
As earlier reported, Twitter’s Board of Directors has adopted a “poison pill” strategy to prevent Elon Musk from taking over the Big Tech platform and adopting free speech policies.
“Twitter,$TWTRannounced that its Board of Directors has unanimously adopted a limited duration shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”),”unusual whalesreported. “The Rights Plan is intended to enable all shareholders to realize the full value of their investment in Twitter.”
“Important: The Rights Plan will reduce the likelihood that any entity, person or group gains control of Twitter through market accumulation without paying all shareholders an appropriate control premium or without providing the Board sufficient time to make informed judgments,” the report added by citing the board’s statement.
Axios also reported that Twitter’s board is adopting the poison pill.
“Twitter’s board on Friday enacted a defensive measure meant to deter Elon Musk’s $43 billion hostile takeover bid,” Axios reported.
“Why it matters: The ‘poison pill,’ as it’s called in corporate terms, gives Twitter’s existing shareholders time to purchase additional shares at a discount, thus diluting Musk’s ownership stake,” the report added.
On Thursday, one of Twitter’s largest corporate shareholders, Vanguard Inc., upped its stake in the Big Tech giant to leap past Elon Musk as the largest single shareholder.
“Elon Musk is no longer the largest shareholder in Twitter, it emerged on Thursday, after asset manager Vanguard Group increased its stake to overtake him,” the Daily Mail reported. “Vanguard now owns 10.3 percent of Twitter, while Musk owns 9.1 percent of the company, making him the largest individual shareholder.”
Musk’s share is still four times that of the only other major individual shareholder in the company: Twitter founder Jack Dorsey.
According to Investopedia, Vanguard has more than $7.50 trillion in assets under management (AUM), second only to BlackRock, Inc ($9.01 trillion AUM), which also owns alarge stake(6.5%) in Twitter.
Vanguard is the “largest issuer of mutual funds in the world and the second-largest issuer of exchange-traded funds (ETFs),” Investopedia also notes.
The Vanguard move is an obvious attempt to frustrate Musk’s attempt to take over Twitter and restore a semblance of free speech on the platform.
Twitter’s board held an emergency meeting on Thursday afternoon to evaluate Musk’s $43 billion offer, valued at $54.20/share. CEO Parag Agrawal spoke to shareholders at the meeting about the offer.
Major Twitter shareholder Saudi Sheikh Al Waleed rejected Elon Musk’s bid,which is significantly higher than the Goldman Sachs appraised target price of $30/share.
But Musk said at a TED conference on Thursday that there is a ‘Plan B.’
“Twitter has become kind of the de facto town square,” Musk said. “So it’s really important that people have both the reality and the perception that they’re able to speak freely… so there’s no sort of behind-the-scenes manipulation, either algorithmically or manually.”
“My strong intuitive sense is that having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization,” Musk continued. “I don’t care about the economics at all.”
“I’m absolutely obsessed with truth,” Musk added.
Musk was asked about what would happen if the Twitter board denied his purchase offer. “Is there a plan B?” he was asked.
“There is,” Musk said during the TED appearance in Vancouver.
However, Musk acknowledged Thursday he is “not sure” if he’ll actually be able to buy Twitter outright. Twitter confirmed it had received his bid, but the board must still review his offer. Musk had underscored that the offer would be his “best and final” one.
Musk also made it clear that the reason he is moving to take over his Twitter is because he is a free speech absolutist who believes that it is necessary for the future of civilization.
“A good sign as to whether there is free speech: is someone you don’t like allowed to say something you don’t like?” he said on Thursday. “If that is the case, then we have free speech.”
Twitter’s board reportedly weighed the “poison pill” strategy to prevent Elon Musk from significantly increasing his stake in the company, theWall Street Journalreported. This defensive strategy, also called a “shareholders rights plan,” complicates hostile takeovers and makes them more expensive for the buyer.
One “poison pill” strategy would allow existing shareholders to purchase additional shares at a discount, which would then effectively dilute the ownership stake of the hostile party.
However, Twitter’s board has a legal obligation to do what’s in the best interest of shareholders. If Twitter fails to do so, the company can be sued. After such a lawsuit, the stock will crash, and Twitter will be even more ripe for the hostile takeover. It’s a lose/lose proposition for Twitter.
You may also like...
NBA Ratings Up. Better Basketball, or Less Wokeness?￼
‘Out Of Touch’ Dems Losing Latino Voters as Woke Policies Continue To Damage Support￼(Video) Google Pixel 7 event in 14 minutes
The Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Don Lemon Has Suddenly Been Dropped￼
The Hunt for the Suspect in the Supreme Court’s Opinion Leak is Fully On￼￼
April 15, 2022 at 7:50 pm
Best job to do in part time and start making more than $500 per day. i received $16429 of my last month working. this job doesnot required any special skills or anything else its just ccd a basic job even a child can do this. join this now by follow instructions here.:) HERE—-> Visit My Name
April 16, 2022 at 10:45 am
Odd why Twitter is saying No the board?
OK Board time to Revolt
Reply(Video) 'Bloomberg Surveillance Simulcast' Full Show10/07/2022
April 16, 2022 at 11:12 am
Maybe bitter Twitter will implode without Elon paying a dime for the company. No big loss.
April 16, 2022 at 12:31 pm
Twitter does not own its own infrastructure. They depend on servers on clouds in Amazon, apple and other sites that are not controlled by them. Musk if he tries to change Twitter from within, can be forced out by external companies controlled by the NWO people just like they did to Parker.
The only company close to being independent is GAB and they could still be put out of business because access to IP addresses are controlled by “others” that could shutdown their access to the WORLD WIDE WEB.
I was thinking of investing in Twitter a small amount, but changed my mind, because even though I agree with what Musk wants to do with Twitter, it might backfire just like it did for Parler.
Those companies that have a monopoly on infrastructure and IP addresses can still derail what he wants to do in the end.
April 16, 2022 at 5:15 pm
Let’s Go Elon, let Free Speech comeback to the U.S.A. and STOP Liberal Socialist Big Tech Companies who want to limit Free Speech. Stop the Liberal Democratic Party once and for all and put them all out of Office. Nancy Pelosi is a disgrace.
Reply(Video) Twitter's Poison Pill defence against Elon Musk Explained (And why a takeover is NOT dead)
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Elon Musk might have cold feet about his offer to buy Twitter, but the company's shareholders are still here for it.
Twitter is suing Musk in Delaware over his abandonment of the deal and wants to make him buy the company.
Elon Musk says he'll reverse Donald Trump Twitter ban
"Would be great to unwind permanent bans, except for spam accounts and those that explicitly advocate violence," he texted Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal shortly after agreeing to join the company's board (a decision he soon backtracked).
Mr Musk said he had backed out because Twitter failed to provide enough information on the number of spam and fake accounts. Twitter says it plans to pursue legal action to enforce the agreement. "The Twitter Board is committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr.
If the deal goes through, Twitter will become a private company. Investors wouldn't be able to buy Twitter stock anymore, and existing shareholders would get a payout of $54.20 for every share they own. What does this mean for investors looking to buy Twitter stock and make a profit before the deal closes?
What will happen to Twitter shareholders? If Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter closes, Twitter shareholders will receive $54.20 in cash for each share, and the company will become private.
To terminate the deal, Mr. Musk claimed that Twitter balked at handing over information about spam bots, also known as fake accounts, on the platform. He repeatedly said he did not believe the company's public statements that roughly 5 percent of its active users are bots.
Twitter's acquisition contract with Musk says it can force him to close the deal. Twitter has a right in its contract with Musk called specific performance, which allows a company to sue to force a transaction to be completed.
A delisting does not directly affect shareholders' rights or claims on the delisted company. It will, however, often depress the share price and make holdings harder to sell, even as thousands of securities trade over-the-counter.
What Happens to Shares When a Company Goes Private? When a publicly traded company becomes a privately held company, the public company's shares are purchased at a premium by the investors buying the company. The company is delisted from the stock exchange where its shares formerly traded.
If Elon Musk and Twitter get their way, the company will soon be privately held and under his control. The most obvious immediate change would likely be Twitter's stock being taken off the New York Stock Exchange.
Can a Shareholder Be Forced to Sell Shares? Absent breach of a contract or the law, a shareholder can't typically force another shareholder to sell. But a shareholder can seek to enforce the terms of a buy-sell agreement, a shareholder agreement, or another valid contract.